<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Stuart Ford</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stuartford.me.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stuartford.me.uk</link>
	<description>I speak my mind involuntarily. It&#039;s both a blessing and a curse.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 08:22:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Asterisk CDR Statistics by Nam</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartford.me.uk/2011/03/asterisk-cdr-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-2445</link>
		<dc:creator>Nam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 08:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartford.me.uk/?p=1248#comment-2445</guid>
		<description>Oh I figure it out:

In php.ini, change date.timezone to the correct timezone will fix the crash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh I figure it out:</p>
<p>In php.ini, change date.timezone to the correct timezone will fix the crash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Asterisk CDR Statistics by Nam</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartford.me.uk/2011/03/asterisk-cdr-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-2444</link>
		<dc:creator>Nam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 08:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartford.me.uk/?p=1248#comment-2444</guid>
		<description>Fantastic! It works right out of the box.

I would like to report a bug: If I clicked on &#039;Month Report&#039; it crashed. This is the error log:

PHP Fatal error:  Uncaught exception &#039;Exception&#039; with message &#039;DateTime::__construct(): It is not safe to rely on the system&#039;s timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected &#039;Asia/Bangkok&#039; for &#039;ICT/7.0/no DST&#039; instead&#039; in /var/www/html/agcdr/application/controllers/ReportsController.php:62\nStack trace:\n#0 /var/www/html/agcdr/application/controllers/ReportsController.php(62): DateTime-&gt;__construct(&#039;2011-12-01&#039;)\n#1 /var/www/html/agcdr/application/classes/Router.php(114): ReportsController-&gt;month()\n#2 /var/www/html/agcdr/public/index.php(103): Router-&gt;loader()\n#3 {main}\n  thrown in /var/www/html/agcdr/application/controllers/ReportsController.php on line 62

Mine is a CentOS 6.2 32bit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic! It works right out of the box.</p>
<p>I would like to report a bug: If I clicked on &#8216;Month Report&#8217; it crashed. This is the error log:</p>
<p>PHP Fatal error:  Uncaught exception &#8216;Exception&#8217; with message &#8216;DateTime::__construct(): It is not safe to rely on the system&#8217;s timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected &#8216;Asia/Bangkok&#8217; for &#8216;ICT/7.0/no DST&#8217; instead&#8217; in /var/www/html/agcdr/application/controllers/ReportsController.php:62\nStack trace:\n#0 /var/www/html/agcdr/application/controllers/ReportsController.php(62): DateTime->__construct(&#8217;2011-12-01&#8242;)\n#1 /var/www/html/agcdr/application/classes/Router.php(114): ReportsController->month()\n#2 /var/www/html/agcdr/public/index.php(103): Router->loader()\n#3 {main}\n  thrown in /var/www/html/agcdr/application/controllers/ReportsController.php on line 62</p>
<p>Mine is a CentOS 6.2 32bit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Asterisk CDR Statistics by Nathan M</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartford.me.uk/2011/03/asterisk-cdr-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-1949</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 04:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartford.me.uk/?p=1248#comment-1949</guid>
		<description>I have a question and then a suggestion on top of it. I have a client that is looking to see a report of the extensions inbound+outbound usage. Along witht hat they want to ability for it to email an entire team 4 times a day. They currently have this on their traditional PBX. Any thoughts would help. I am about to install this to see if you have the extension usage report.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question and then a suggestion on top of it. I have a client that is looking to see a report of the extensions inbound+outbound usage. Along witht hat they want to ability for it to email an entire team 4 times a day. They currently have this on their traditional PBX. Any thoughts would help. I am about to install this to see if you have the extension usage report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Asterisk CDR Statistics by Slanj</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartford.me.uk/2011/03/asterisk-cdr-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-1627</link>
		<dc:creator>Slanj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartford.me.uk/?p=1248#comment-1627</guid>
		<description>Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Asterisk CDR Statistics by Stuart Ford</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartford.me.uk/2011/03/asterisk-cdr-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-1618</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Ford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartford.me.uk/?p=1248#comment-1618</guid>
		<description>Indeed, I did see your request. My apologies for not acting on it sooner, I have been busy. I&#039;m going to implement that and a few other AGCDR issues over the coming weeks. Thank you for your interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, I did see your request. My apologies for not acting on it sooner, I have been busy. I&#8217;m going to implement that and a few other AGCDR issues over the coming weeks. Thank you for your interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Asterisk CDR Statistics by Slanj</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartford.me.uk/2011/03/asterisk-cdr-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-1615</link>
		<dc:creator>Slanj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartford.me.uk/?p=1248#comment-1615</guid>
		<description>Hello!

Thank you for your system.

At first, as wrote on Google Code, it would be great to define time period on which data on summary page displayed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello!</p>
<p>Thank you for your system.</p>
<p>At first, as wrote on Google Code, it would be great to define time period on which data on summary page displayed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mountain biking renaissance by J Park</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartford.me.uk/2011/06/mountain-biking-renaissance/comment-page-1/#comment-765</link>
		<dc:creator>J Park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartford.me.uk/?p=1363#comment-765</guid>
		<description>Hi Stuart,
WONDERFUL bike you have there... when you have a moment, could you please pop me an email as I&#039;d love to ask you some questions about it?  I had one like it when I was a teenager as well... fond memories :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stuart,<br />
WONDERFUL bike you have there&#8230; when you have a moment, could you please pop me an email as I&#8217;d love to ask you some questions about it?  I had one like it when I was a teenager as well&#8230; fond memories :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If you had to shoot one person, who would it be and why? by Ben Nimmo</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartford.me.uk/2010/07/if-you-had-to-shoot-one-person-who-would-it-be-and-why/comment-page-1/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Nimmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartford.me.uk/?p=1109#comment-546</guid>
		<description>I could not agree more with your choice of person. He was first on my list!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could not agree more with your choice of person. He was first on my list!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mountain biking renaissance by Dan Holdsworth</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartford.me.uk/2011/06/mountain-biking-renaissance/comment-page-1/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Holdsworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 22:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartford.me.uk/?p=1363#comment-395</guid>
		<description>Try padded cycling underwear; does the same job as cycling shorts, without making you look so daft. Secondly, get a 1:25 000 map of where you&#039;re going; those work rather well. Compasses aren&#039;t needed unless you&#039;re out on open, featureless moors.

Finally, a really wide front tyre is passable front suspension.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try padded cycling underwear; does the same job as cycling shorts, without making you look so daft. Secondly, get a 1:25 000 map of where you&#8217;re going; those work rather well. Compasses aren&#8217;t needed unless you&#8217;re out on open, featureless moors.</p>
<p>Finally, a really wide front tyre is passable front suspension.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PHP Vacancy by Stuart Ford</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartford.me.uk/2011/04/php-vacancy/comment-page-1/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Ford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartford.me.uk/?p=1343#comment-394</guid>
		<description>This position has now been filled. Many thanks to everyone who showed an interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This position has now been filled. Many thanks to everyone who showed an interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Command line Twitter script by Jimbo</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartford.me.uk/2011/01/command-line-twitter-script/comment-page-1/#comment-381</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 21:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartford.me.uk/?p=1207#comment-381</guid>
		<description>Works very well. Thanks Stuart. Appreciated</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Works very well. Thanks Stuart. Appreciated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on No to the Alternative Vote by Ricey</title>
		<link>http://www.stuartford.me.uk/2011/04/no-to-the-alternative-vote/comment-page-1/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 07:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartford.me.uk/?p=1277#comment-374</guid>
		<description>The Australian survey asked 1012 people the following question:
&quot;Currently, elections for the *Federal* House of Representatives, or lower house, use a preferential voting system. This is where voters indicate an order of preferences for *all* candidates, and these preferences are taken into account when deciding which candidate wins. (PAUSE). An alternative system would be &quot;first past the post&quot;, where voters only vote for one candidate and the candidate with the most votes wins. Would you personally prefer…?&quot; &quot;A preferential system&quot; &quot;A first past the post system&quot; (choices offered randomly)
That&#039;s a bit of a false dichotomy as it offers ranking all candidates or ranking one. AV as proposed here gives the option of doing either and any inbetween. The poll got 57% FPTP, 37% preferential, 5% dunno. There&#039;s an interesting split in that preference seems to shift from preferential to FPTP as respondents get older, perhaps they get hacked off with their governments. Certainly in their last election FPTP would have given them a stronger coalition government - but still a coalition. I think Australia&#039;s had AV since the end of WWI and brought in mandatory voting shortly afterwards. Apparently now 29% want voluntary voting. The survey author says &quot;When voters are dissatisfied with what’s on offer from the major parties, voluntary voting gives them a powerful form of political self expression – withholding their vote. Nothing could send a clearer message to political parties that they need to lift their game.&quot; There&#039;s quite some &quot;political self expression&quot; going on in the UK in recent elections!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Australian survey asked 1012 people the following question:<br />
&#8220;Currently, elections for the *Federal* House of Representatives, or lower house, use a preferential voting system. This is where voters indicate an order of preferences for *all* candidates, and these preferences are taken into account when deciding which candidate wins. (PAUSE). An alternative system would be &#8220;first past the post&#8221;, where voters only vote for one candidate and the candidate with the most votes wins. Would you personally prefer…?&#8221; &#8220;A preferential system&#8221; &#8220;A first past the post system&#8221; (choices offered randomly)<br />
That&#8217;s a bit of a false dichotomy as it offers ranking all candidates or ranking one. AV as proposed here gives the option of doing either and any inbetween. The poll got 57% FPTP, 37% preferential, 5% dunno. There&#8217;s an interesting split in that preference seems to shift from preferential to FPTP as respondents get older, perhaps they get hacked off with their governments. Certainly in their last election FPTP would have given them a stronger coalition government &#8211; but still a coalition. I think Australia&#8217;s had AV since the end of WWI and brought in mandatory voting shortly afterwards. Apparently now 29% want voluntary voting. The survey author says &#8220;When voters are dissatisfied with what’s on offer from the major parties, voluntary voting gives them a powerful form of political self expression – withholding their vote. Nothing could send a clearer message to political parties that they need to lift their game.&#8221; There&#8217;s quite some &#8220;political self expression&#8221; going on in the UK in recent elections!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

